The group in contact charity is different and amazing. Loch is not a mammoth, or how you are thrown to charity. Police detain a hacker from Syzran
Fighters Against Fraudsters has established 14 nominations to laugh at parents and their children with cancer.
The family of Varvara Malkova from Volgograd was among the victims at the hands of the group administrators in the social network VKontakte. The baby's parents were nominated for the victory in the nominations "The most arrogant and greedy parents of the year", "Ongefather" of the year ", as well as" The most "expensive" free treatment of the year. Let's talk about everything in order.
Today correspondents of the site "Notebook Volgograd" found that the group, which talks about the treatment of three-year-old Varvara Malkova in Belgium, has been blocked. We were confused by the wording: "The community is blocked for suspicious donations for charitable purposes." From the very beginning up to the present moment “Notepad” has been following the fate of Varvara, and every day we look through the news about her well-being. Fundraising was suspended immediately after the baby was in Belgium, so the wording looks suspicious. We contacted Varya's mom:
Well-wishers did their best, - Olesya Malkova admitted, - we contacted technical support, explained that fundraising had been closed for a long time, and the group would be opened soon.
The administration of the Charity: Different and Amazing group turned out to be well-wishers. According to Varya's mom, they were offended that the parents closed the group to everyone except subscribers, and these people can no longer use posts and mock their child.
We looked through the group and were shocked: fundraising for each child from Volgograd and other regions of the country here turns into a heated discussion for discussion.
“How to make a source of continuous collection from a deeply disabled child” (we are talking about a 6-year-old girl with multiple intrauterine malformations) is the name of one post.
“Nothing changes in online charity. There are more and more parents ready to make money from the misfortune of their children. The number of those who fall for the bait of such parents is not decreasing, ”the administrators warn.
The group rules indicate that in discussions you need to indicate your point of view and argue for it.
Expressions like: “It seems so to me”, “It has always been this way”, “This is correct, because it is true”, “And you at least helped someone!” ”Etc. are not arguments, - the administrators wrote.
But at the same time, for some reason, they forget that only investigators can accuse people of fraud. And so it still needs to be proven in court. The article on libel in the Criminal Code has not yet been canceled.
I asked 12 people a question: how do you feel about charity. 7 of the respondents answered that it is positive, but 11 people do not want to take part in charity. The reasons are very different: money will not reach the addressee, lack of transparency in reports, scammers. This survey has shown that the topic is really burning. It is possible that the people who create such groups themselves faced scammers, and therefore adopted such a principled position. In general, you need to understand that the idea of \u200b\u200bcharity is at the top when people have free money. Now we are experiencing an economic crisis, and accordingly, such groups can be a psychological defense. That is, I do not give money, because there are scammers all around. The very idea of \u200b\u200bcharity is becoming irrelevant, says psychologist Anatoly Sergeev. @bloknot_volgograd
Recall that in July 2016, Varvara began to have health problems. For some unknown reason, the high temperature rose to +39 degrees. At the same time, no symptoms of a cold were observed. The doctors prescribed antibiotics and antiviral drugs to the girl, but this gave only a temporary result. And later my mother noticed: Varvara's gait was twisted. The girl struggled to get out of bed. As a result, the baby was sent for examination to the children's hemato-oncology department, and later.
The Belgian side promised to treat the patient free of charge. It is not yet known whether the treatment will have to be paid for, a final decision on this has not yet been made.
As soon as the parents learned that the money for the treatment might not be required, they stopped fundraising. If the money is not required, then the Malkovs promise to transfer it to the account of another sick child.
Treatment gives positive results: metastases from the head have completely disappeared, but remain in the bones of the knees. The child has already undergone four courses of chemotherapy.
News on Bloknot-VolgogradHello citizens and citizens.
My name is Rustem, I am 33 years old. Until recently, I was a completely normal, adequate person, but four and a half years ago I was suddenly swept away into a difficult and controversial topic, the topic of charity. Moreover, it demolished so tightly and seriously that a year ago our (mine and like-minded people) community of dobrykhdel.zhzh.rf has grown to a real, full-fledged charity fund "Day of Good Deeds" with a beautiful piece of paper on state registration and a bunch of accompanying troubles, and we went from the category of volunteer enthusiasts to the category of even beginners and nifiga not able, but still professionals. Due to this very professional activity, in addition to other people's problems that need to be solved, we regularly encounter various frauds and scams built on human compassion. We clump together so often that it's time to write a book on this topic. So this post (by the way, my first post as a resident) can be considered a test of the pen.
So, charity, different and amazing. The first thing you need to know about charity is: don’t trust anyone. That is, no one at all. Never to anyone. If I had an acute, vital need for money without the prospect of earning it honestly, in two weeks I would have expropriated a couple of million rubles from gullible suckers. Easy, casual, and I would never get caught. If there are those among the readers of this blog who do not disdain such methods of earning a livelihood - get the hell out of here, sooner or later we will get to you and get rid of it. Those who disdain and do not want to become the next compassionate breadwinner of the next crooks - wellness under cat.
1. Street beggars. Recently, this category has somehow rapidly multiplied, at least start shooting. Everything is simple here: on the street, as a rule, near the parking lot of a shopping complex, i.e. where people with money are guaranteed to go, dramatic-looking young men and women come up to you and talk about a charity event in favor of some orphanage. The essence of the charity event: dramatic young men and women must be given a dough, in cash, right now. Some especially cunning ones do not beg, but "sell" you for 150-200 rubles some unnecessary garbage such as a keychain or wet wipes - as a rule, this garbage is sold in a store next door for 20-30 rubles. Naturally, this money does not go to any orphanage, although the "collectors" are well instructed and know how to beautifully answer uncomfortable questions. As soon as the degree of uncomfortable questions rises to dangerous levels or nit-picking of documents begins, dramatic young men and women usually leave the stage with a brisk pace, demonstrating a fair amount of agility.
In order to be, albeit not a mammoth, but at least not a sucker, you need to know that the collector must have receipts from the organization or a sealed collection box, an official document (power of attorney) confirming his right to collect cash donations, an identity document, Regulations on the target program for which money is collected, and the phone number of the manager, who should tell you where you can view the expense report. All documents must be with blue stamps, reports on fees and expenses, all organizations accepting charitable contributions are required to publish in open sources. But it's easier to take a dramatic young man (or girl) by the elbow and offer him a ride to the nearest police station to file an administrative complaint about the fact of begging. If the organization is normal, until the leaders appear and everything is turned off, if there are swindlers, then leaders may also appear and try to fill the clever man's face. Although in 99% of cases the gatherer just gives a fight.
2. Toxic collectors on social media. "Toxic" is the kind of semi-professional jargon used to define suspicious or outright fraudulent collection of money on social networks. This is a great topic for a doctoral dissertation in criminology. In short, several dozen groups like "Let's help the whole world!", "Let's save Alyoshenka (Petenka, Serezhenka)" and the like are registered in popular social networks every day. Each of these groups can collect 5-6 million rubles per week, especially if real, professional scammers, or, as we call them, "svolonteurs" are engaged in business. Everything is simple here: a psychologically well-written text, which emphasizes the urgency factor ("every minute counts!"), The factor of saving the child's life and the factor of the importance of any minimal participation ("even 50 rubles will save the baby !!!") completely demolish the brain of the newly born vulnerable mothers, or even a fairly large set of caring people. "Toksiki" work on emotions, in which rational thinking fades into the background, and on the effect of "pine forest": you are unlikely to arrange a showdown because of 50-100 rubles, send it - and forget. Look how many people are registered on Vkontakte as of today, multiply by 50 rubles - isn't it a wonderful, promising market?
How not to run into "toxic":
Just think with your head. Google the diagnosis, Google the child's name and wallet numbers for which the collection is being conducted (lack of normal details, collecting money only for e-wallets, Qiwi and mobile phone number is the first sign of toxicosis). An interesting story can easily come up, for example, very often different gatherings under different names are illustrated with a photograph of the same child.
- read profile communities, for example moshennikov_net
... There are just a bunch of wonderful stories, including repeated mentions of the most odious toxic collectors of the Runet.
- consult with a specialist whether this particular treatment is really needed in this particular clinic for this disease, and how much it may actually cost.
- insolently, without undue tenderness, request documents. They will most likely show them to you - there are indeed scanned invoices in almost every toxic group. Take the time to call the invoicing clinic and find out what they are asking for and if they even know this child.
3. "Charitable" funds. Unfortunately, there are such dofig, and there are more and more. Google how many funds have raised (and are collecting) money for flood victims in the Far East and summarize the results of their activities. With this money, not only the Far East, the whole of Russia can be built up with cottages (by the way, cottages, by the way, will probably appear, but not for those affected by the flood).
Charitable foundations are more complicated than the previous two categories of scammers. Everything can be beautiful there: constituent documents, reporting, regular publications in the press - no specialist will understand where the catch is. It makes sense to strain when you find the same signs that suspicious online stores sin: lack of updates and reports on promotions on the site, lack of information about the board of trustees (supervisory) council and employees, lack of financial reporting (as a rule, there is a link, but there is no file) , collecting money for the treatment of children, for whom all and sundry are collecting all over the network. The main feature of the scam funds is medical tourism. A really sick child is really collecting money and really providing him unnecessary medical services at crazy prices. The child ultimately dies, and the fund's workers keep a commission from the clinic, which has "planted" a "fee" for the "treatment" on their accounts, plus the remains of collected donations that they did not have time to spend.
If you are not ready to spend several hours of your life studying the specifics of reporting and the rules for the activities of charitable foundations, but want to support the project of one of them, the easiest way is to honestly admit to yourself whether the result that the fund undertakes to provide for your money is visible to you. whether the work of the fund is transparent, or you will never be able to reliably find out exactly how your contribution was spent and whether it benefited someone other than the fund's employees.
4. Morally corrupted parents. Freebies are known to corrupt. Some parents of children with disabilities who have received help for their child one, two or more times come to the obvious and logical conclusion that, swinging the diagnosis of their baby and his sad photograph, they can collect money for free and live on this money quite happily. Parents, who put in their fees for treatment two weeks of living for themselves in a five-star hotel on a warm coast near the clinic, are still flowers. Some naturally manage to buy cars, apartments, and generally live comfortably on donations that they have gotten used to collecting. It is very difficult to talk to such citizens: they pressure on pity in a quality manner, and they answer all uncomfortable questions with a murderous argument - do not count other people's money, if you want to help - help, if you do not want - walk by. The worst thing is that some consider themselves absolutely right and do not see anything reprehensible in such begging, and sometimes even outright extortion.
What disappointing conclusions follow from all of the above. What is not allowed to participate in charity projects? No, it is possible, and even necessary. Personally, I think that for a person who has some kind of surplus, the best way to dispose of them is to give to the person who has a deficiency. And we are not necessarily talking about money - it can be an excess of free time, acquaintances, whatever. To assemble a playground in a neighboring boarding school with your own hands is also charity, just in non-monetary form. Thinking not only about yourself, but also about others, spending at least one day a year on good deeds that are not related to caring for your own well-being is really the most effective and almost the only way to create a better world than the one that there is now.
It's just that in everything, no matter how trite it may sound, you need to think not only with your heart, but also with your head. Especially when it comes to providing charitable assistance. Do not trust anyone, never trust anyone - check. Independently, corrosive and meticulous. Do not get fooled by emotions, the crooks expect only this from you. Count, check, ask questions. The more picky you are, the more chances that your help will really go to someone who needs it, and not go to another swindler to buy another Porsche-Caen. It makes sense to give money or otherwise help a charitable project only if your help provides a visual, transparent, understandable, quantitative and qualitatively measurable result, and you can definitely trace the causal relationship between your participation and this result.
And if you lose the habit of reposting unverified calls for help on social networks, I will assume that I did not live this Monday in vain.
Anonymous, please.
https://www.instagram.com/lilia_lllkoda/
Lilia Murashova, Krasnodar, 5 years old, shunted hydrocephalus, cerebral palsy.
The story of how a large family earns money for itself with the help of a sick youngest daughter. Lilia, a premature girl with hydrocephalus, lived like on a volcano, constantly traveling to Moscow, until she got a shunt working. But something went wrong again, the shunt began to show dysfunction. Then mother Yulia, who had read a lot of clever books (and before the birth of her sick daughter, she had only casual contact with medicine, and certainly not with neurosurgery), decided that she was now a tough neurosurgeon, and Moscow "luminaries" were so-so. She decided that Lilya is shunt independent, she does not need a shunt, it must be removed. And also insert plates into the skull to improve the shape of the head. Moscow did not support her ideas. But Mom, restless, rushed to Peter. Of course, without spending your money, and without opening a collection, as is now fashionable. It's just that people themselves wanted to help. In St. Petersburg, they needed new clothes for Lily (she arrived naked, and there was nothing from the older children), baby purees, and most importantly - a new stroller (which could be carried out by IPRA, Lily is a disabled child, she has strollers inscribed, she is not walking ). The collection, or rather not the collection, but just a request, was on the plates in the head, and the money went to everything else. But the people are kind, gathered for everything. They performed an operation, removed the shunt, placed plates. The shape of the head has not improved in any way, even the back of the head has become flatter. This is not bad, the main thing is that the girl cannot live without a shunt. She is at home in Krasnodar, then she is urgently dragged to St. Petersburg to pump fluid from the skull. Mom groans that there is not enough money, that they live in a private apartment (for some reason, not in a hospital), that they need a shunt for 180 thousand and for 290 thousand a programmer-suitcase (which neurosurgeons put pressure in the shunt. honey organizations, not individuals). Nothing is free, there are no quotas, nothing, just the groans of Yulia Murasheva. She deletes questions about the amount collected, just as she does not issue receipts for paid plates, a stroller, etc. Occasionally she puts receipts either from a children's store, or from a pharmacy where adult medicines were bought, receipts without dates, receipts for Japanese diapers ... Today, an extract from an incomprehensible doctor has appeared, no seal, no signature ... Although even in small regional cities, doctors put a seal with their name on their signature. It is not known what the child's pension is spent on. According to the compulsory medical insurance, the treatment is too bad for them, and the funds are asking for too many documents. It's easier to scream! From the card where the collection is carried out, the money is simply transferred to your personal card. But my mother gives lectures on neurosurgery and the basics of hydrocephalus in her Instragram.
Members of the “Charity: Different and Amazing” community do not feel personal dislike for any of the members of the Veronika Zhidkova help group, but only stand up for honesty in collecting money and following the rules. This is reported in a letter that came to the editorial office of our site.
Recall that recently, the help group of Veronika Zhidkova was banned from collecting money for treatment. This happened after the VKontakte administration received complaints about violations of the rules of running a charitable group. Now the community can only inform about the child's health. Irina Agureeva, the moderator of the help group, in an interview with our website, gives her point of view on this situation. One of the reasons for the suspension of fundraising, she named a complaint from community members "Charity: Different and Amazing".
In turn, the members of the “Charity: Different and Amazing” community, after the publication of the publication, stated that Agureeva's explanations contain information that misleads the residents of Syzran. Claims against the group, according to them, have serious grounds. The members of the “Charity: Different and Amazing” group told about this in more detail in the written answer to our questions. We present it below. Punctuation and spelling are preserved.
Tell us about your group? When was it created? What is the purpose of her work?
The Charity: Different and Amazing Community was launched in March 2013 and is an expanded thematic continuation of the groups "Temporary Shelter" (2011-2013, now deleted, the information has been moved to the public BRU) and "Fraudsters on the Net" (2011). The public has the character of a discussion club, its purpose is to discuss various aspects of real and virtual charity, both negative and positive. Particular emphasis is placed on the discussion and collection of information on online help groups. We hope that participating in our discussions and reading public materials will give potential donors the opportunity to consciously and thoughtfully choose an object for help, understand the collection mechanisms, learn to recognize the pitfalls of charity and its downside, and so on.
Why did the group of help to Veronika Zhidkova on the VKontakte website come to the attention of the group "Charity: Different and Amazing"?
The help group for Veronika Zhidkova got into the attention of the BRU public due to non-compliance with the rules for maintaining and registering charitable groups in the Contact ( ), as well as systematic misleading of donors.
What are the specific claims against the help group for Veronika Zhidkova?
The following claims were made against the group:
- The absence of documented refusals of Russian clinics to provide further treatment for Veronica (namely, this was emphasized in the help group as a justification for the need to travel for treatment abroad), moreover, in the extracts provided in the section documents there are appointments and a planned plan for further treatment of girls in Russia.
- Lack of a scheduled monthly and amount calculation for food and accommodation during treatment abroad for a child and an accompanying person (paragraph 6, subparagraph 7 of the section "Supporting documents and photographs" of the VK collection rules, link above). All these expenses were carried out in a group from the main amount COLLECTED BY ACCOUNT FOR TREATMENT, which is an unacceptable violation.
- Continued collection on the current account for 250 thousand US dollars, despite the fact that the indicated amount was collected with an overkill. The administration explained the refusal to close the current collection by the presence of significant expenses for accommodation and meals (violation of paragraph 6, subparagraph 7 of the section "Supporting documents and photographs" of the VK collection rules), as well as additional, unforeseen expenses in the clinic. This is also a violation of the rules of fees, because in the event of unforeseen and unaccounted-for expenses related to treatment, it is necessary to receive a new invoice from the clinic indicating the services provided, not previously foreseen, and open a new, additional fee in the group based on the above. additional account.
Lack of documentary evidence of the need to travel abroad for treatment not only for the child's mother, but also for the father. In the group, this need was explained by the fact that Veronica's mother had a serious heart disease. A medical statement confirming the diagnosis of the mother was not provided in the group, everything is in words. Meanwhile, the maintenance of the father in Israel also required additional funds, which were spent, as indicated above, from the funds collected from the account for the girl's treatment.
- Lack of a complete picture and report on receipts and expenditures (violation of paragraphs 1,3,4 of the "Reporting on fundraising" section of the rules for maintaining and registering help groups). Namely: providing donors with checks on expenses in Hebrew, which is an extreme disrespect for benefactors (it should be noted separately that the group moderators, including I. Agureev, also do not speak Hebrew, as a result of which they could not control the proper spending of funds . And, accordingly, they violated the sub-clause of the reporting rules, which reads “Parents and volunteers are responsible for the intended use of funds, and this should be indicated in the group.” During the verification of checks and their translation from Hebrew into Russian by independent translators, it was found that the receipts provided as a report for expenses included: cigarettes, beer, washcloths, personal hygiene products, other purchases that could have been avoided if parents had saved other people's funds, collected by grain on the ACCOUNT of their daughter, and would have brought essentials with you from Russia, as other parents do.
- Lack of comprehensive reports on the receipt by parents of cash from donors from hand to hand, as well as on the withdrawal of money (officially, with the execution of an act of seizure of funds in the presence of witnesses) from boxes installed in various organizations, shopping centers and other institutions in Syzran.
- Violation of clause 5 of the "Reporting on fundraising" section.
- Mass inclusion in the Black List of the group, without the possibility of access, of people who asked questions about the collection and pointed out gross violations of the rules of running charitable groups.
How can they be justified?
The rules for maintaining and registering charitable groups on the Contact (https://vk.com/page-16365116_34851124 ). So that you have no doubts that it is these rules that the VK administration is guided by when checking the help groups, we attach a screen of the TP response to the question of the VK user about the availability of such.
Do you think that the activities of your group members did not really influence the decision of technical support to block the help group for Veronika Zhidkova?
Indeed, after some members of our community were brought in by the admins to the emergency situation for legitimate questions about the collection in the group of Veronika Zhidkova, several complaints were sent to the TP VK. We also reliably know that the main number of complaints to the TP were sent by donors who were not members of the BRU - members of Veronica's group, who were surprised to find that they were transferring money not only for TREATMENT of the child on the account from the clinic (as declared in the description of the group and in the appeals, published on leaflets), but also for the maintenance of the whole family in Israel, for trips to the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem (which is absolutely contraindicated for an oncologically sick child with zero immunity, according to the requirements and prescriptions of the sangiga for these diseases), and for others not related to treatment needs. After the indignation in the group, these donors were also brought in by the collection administrators for Veronica in the emergency. But! To check help groups, TP VK is guided by the above rules and instructions, and no collection can be blocked or suspended at the request of TP, if all the rules of collection in the group are observed. Even if absolutely all VK users complain about such a group. No violations - no blocking. Thus, the decision to block the group of Veronika Zhidkova TP was made solely on the basis of the presence of multiple, gross violations in this collection.
To date, the group continues to keep silent about the current course of the child's treatment. Documents and interim extracts, documentary confirmation of the new treatment plan (in the words of the group) are not provided to donors. Reports on receipts after the suspension of the collection were not provided (it is known for certain that funds continued to flow). The donors, who were previously included in the group's emergency situations for legitimate issues, have not been amnestied. We have made conclusions, make them and you, after a thorough analysis of the information provided by the two parties.
We add that at the moment, the treatment of 4-year-old syranium Veronica Zhidkova in Israel continues. Girl preparing for transplant bone marrow. She must be admitted to the clinic for the last chemotherapy block before BMT. It was previously planned that the course of "chemistry" will last until March 2016. The amount raised by the benefactors (over 250 thousand dollars) should be enough - say representatives of the help group for Veronika Zhidkova on the VKontakte website.
Previous publications
Killed by negligence of adults
In Syzran, a tragedy happened again: once again, a child died under ridiculous circumstances. The accident took the life of a teenager. Together with his friends, a 13-year-old student of school No. 5 played in ...Police detain a hacker from Syzran
Law enforcers detained a 22-year-old resident of Syzran suspected of committing a cybercrime. According to the head of the "K" department of the BSTM of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Samara region, lieutenant colonel of police ...Group name
Requests for financial assistance are not published in the public.
Description
All about online charity, its pitfalls and heroes. Rules for posting on the wall: 1. Your post should contain a description of the situation that you propose for discussion; 2. The text should be understandable to the person who learns about the situation from you; 3. The text should contain links, or better screenshots, to facts confirming your opinion about the situation; 4. If you offer to place a call for help - do not be surprised where the asking questions came from in your collection. We may well take advantage of your offer to see your group; 5. The author is responsible for the content of the post; 6. If the author wishes to remain anonymous, fearing boomerangs - let him indicate in the post; 7. Posts in two lines "oh brothers, something is wrong there - and the link" is not posted. Disclaimer The goal of the public administration is to create a comfortable environment for communication. To actively participate in the life of the public, you must adhere to certain rules of behavior. The implementation of the Rules and the work of the public is controlled by administrators and moderators. Public rules are not contested or discussed. The public administration reserves the right to change and supplement this set of rules of conduct and communication. Discussion principles acceptable to the administration: 1. We are a secular public. Therefore, any references to religious boomerangs, beliefs and prejudices will not be perceived as argumentation of the position. 2. If you have an alternative opinion on the issue under discussion - argue it. This makes the discussion different from the scandal in the bazaar. The narrator must prove why he thinks so. Expressions like: “It seems to me so”, “It has always been like this”, “All Ukrainians are greedy”, “This is right, because it’s true”, “And you at least helped someone! "Etc. are not arguments. References to scientific articles, comments from recognized experts on the issue under discussion, screenshots and medical documents can be considered valid arguments. 3. The public administration categorically does not support the measurement of merit to charity. 4. We proceed from the principles of evidence-based medicine. 5. We discourage going personal in discussions and referring to other discussions in interpersonal fights. All attempts to create and shake an artificial conflict will be suppressed 6. The administration of the public is against any manifestation of discrimination by age, sex, nationality, etc. 7. Discussions in this group are not guidelines for action. If you want to get a doctor's advice, you can consult on Rusmedserver or in the specialized community. 8. The purpose of this public is, first of all, to discuss a topic of interest to us, namely, charity in all its manifestations. Dealing with justice and saving the world is beyond our interests. 9. The administration of the public is not responsible for the personal opinion of the participants and guests of the public, as well as for the fees that the participants lead outside the public. Any fees for any purpose in the public are prohibited. 10. All materials are the property of the public, posting on third-party resources is possible with a mandatory link to the public as a source. The administration is extremely negative about attempts to use the name of the public as a scarecrow in gathering groups and draws the attention of participants to the fact that their behavior is their personal, personal choice and responsibility. The public administration understands that the topics discussed can cause a violent emotional reaction. Therefore, we try to warn violators before banning. At the same time, we reserve the right to abruptly end discussions fraught with measurements of IMHs outside the topic "Fludernaya". We reserve the right to suspend a group member who leads an overly emotional polemic from participating in discussions for up to a week without warning with an appropriate comment.
Community type
Public page
Activity type
Discussion club
Community entries:
Charity: Different and Amazing March 26, 2019 at 07:00
Dear participants and guests of the public.
Recent discussions force us to write a post-clarification.
Public administration fees:
1. Does not lead
2. Doesn't check
3. Does not recommend
4. Strongly disapproves, any and all
We strongly recommend not to give guarantees on fees in the community. No recommendation. Do not send to, in your opinion, honest fees and groups. None of the recommenders is responsible for the fees, and we will not allow anyone to cheat on our territory.
In the future, we will punish in an extremely harsh manner for recommending "fair" fees in public, without warning and the right to appeal.
The post is non-negotiable.
Thank you for understanding.
Philanthropy: Different and Amazing Feb 29 at 19:28
Hello. There is a geek collecting money for brain cancer treatment. This is a famous swindler, if you drive in Google "Maxim Danilov swindler". Here is a link to his account https://instagram.com/danilov5375?igshid\u003d1jdhcr53yobic. Not a single document confirming the diagnosis, the purpose of collection, not a single invoice, report - of course there is. Almost all posts are closed comments on the fact that people ask questions. If you ask for documents, they instantly block. This person collected 2 years ago for cancer treatment, but then the doctors allegedly made a mistake. There are posts about his fraud on Instagram, but the people who post them are attacked by his team from his portal www.lifedd.ru, but the most interesting thing is that this person was on NTV in a program where he stated that disabled people are not people, they are animals need to get rid of https://m.youtube.com/watch?v\u003dLjU8c8TCbUc&feature\u003dyoutu.be. Please help to block this bastard and make it public. Below are some more links about him. thanks