Text editors. Aquamacs. Powerful free text editor for Mac OS X Text editors for mac

Not everyone needs powerful text editors that support complex formatting, tables, graphs and the like. But you need to have a convenient and lightweight editor at hand. Here's how to choose the one that's best for you.

Atom

Atom

This editor has a little bit of everything, and some are done better, and some are done worse. The development is carried out by the same people who are (were) behind GitHub. Therefore, the program code is open, and the editor itself is completely free.

For beginners, this is the most suitable tool. Immediately after installation, you will receive the minimum necessary to work with texts. And for additional functions you can install extensions.

The developers position Atom as one of the most customizable editors in the world. You can easily customize the interface to suit your needs. And the Teletype extension will add the function collaboration above the text.

Atom is also cross-platform.

TextWrangler

TextWrangler

TextWrangler has a user-friendly interface that is easy for anyone to understand. If you are used to old editors without any "candy wrappers", then you have found it.

In addition to working with text, you can work with code here. For example, AppleScript, CSS and HTML.

For more comfortable work above the text there are powerful autocorrect tools when searching through files, different topics and syntax highlighting. Connection via FTP and SFTP is supported.

Basic capabilities are expanding paid features. For example, real-time preview of code changes.

Vim

Vim

This editor is not suitable for everyone. Working with Vim is done from command line, and the editor itself is already built into MacOs. So you can start working with it right now.

If you are still with me, then let's continue. The editor comes with a large stack of documentation that tells you how and what to do. And also a training session for 30 minutes. But to get to the documentation, you will have to learn how to work with the command line.

Did you cope with the task? Then Vim will offer you a rich range of services for working with text. Maybe even more than a regular editor. But you'll have to work hard and find out how to make it work.

Doesn't work? Then you can try MacVim. This is the same Vim, only with an interface and buttons.

GNU Emacs

GNU Emacs

Another text editor for those who are not looking for simple ways. The first version of the program appeared in 1976.

Working with Emacs is based on the Emacs-Lisp programming language, which appeared even earlier (in 1958). Even for the simplest actions in the program you will have to write code. But it is precisely because of this that the editor can perform the most incredible tasks.

Also here is: mail client, news reader, file manager and games, such as Tetris and Snake. In general, everything you need to work on the text.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Relatively new editor, which has nothing to do with Microsoft's Visual Studio. This is a lightweight program with support for scripts and plugins.

You can find plugins for both text and code. There are so many plugins that a whole store has been created for them, like App Store or Google Play. Visual Studio Code out of the box has only basic set features and weighs almost nothing.

What text editor do you use?

Due to the nature of my work, I type a large amount of text - and on a laptop I do it in a very simple and convenient program iA Writer. Yes, we have already talked about the version of this application for iPad, but still, working with text on a computer is much more convenient, so today we will talk about the “desktop” version of iA Writer.

If your line of work requires you to write large texts and you understand that a traditional text editor is not entirely suitable for these purposes, pay attention to Scrivener.

With its help, simply working on texts turns into normal, full-fledged work on a project - with its own planning, notes, the main part of the text, etc. Naturally, neither for book authors, nor for researchers, nor for anyone else, this program will make their main task easier - writing good texts. However, it will allow you not to be distracted, it will combine all the necessary things in one window, leaving the main thing to the author.

Working on any large project involves various stages. First of all, you need to explore the subject area, saving for study the most useful information— for this purpose, Scrivener has a special tab where, in addition to text, you can save various materials.

Planning is also important, as is recording thoughts and drawing up a list of actions. Offline, such notes are often pinned onto a cork board; the program developers decided not to reinvent the wheel and simply created exactly the same board, but virtual, within the program.

When working on any large text, it is important to understand what “big” is. You should always know at least approximate volumes. For writers we're talking about about the number of characters. The program has the ability to set the volume of text as a goal and, as you write its various parts, track progress and thereby understand how much has already been completed and, accordingly, how much is left to the end.

More details in the video:

Program cost: $40

I am writing this post in a very unusual editor. It’s much more logical to even say - in a different environment. Having tried many different types over the past 10 years text editors, I can confidently say that this particular one is “different” and is not like all the others.

However, as I already wrote, it’s more likely the environment. An environment for writing texts, where there is no one except the author of the text and space. There is no large and sophisticated functionality, no lists, functions, various settings at hand. They are present in small quantities in the program itself, but are available most likely before or after working with the text. During the same time, they are more likely to distract.

The following video describes the best way to work with OmmWriter. There are very calm, white, quiet landscapes, a melodic unobtrusive melody and the quiet sound of the keys that each left letter leaves.

In general, if you often write various texts, or even sometimes - but at this moment you have a need so that nothing distracts you from working with the text - we recommend trying OmmWriter.

By the way, here’s what popular blogger Armen Petrosyan, from whom I saw a link to it, said about this program:

Actually, I like to write on paper with a thin fountain pen. I really like to write with a soft pencil on rough paper. When I started working a lot on the computer, it took me a long time to get used to the need to type text in Word. I didn’t like everything about it. Then there were many attempts to find a text editor that was acceptable to me. Acceptable not in terms of functionality. In this regard, I did not have many complaints. Most often I just type the text of my articles or blog posts. I don't need any fancy functions.

I was looking for a tool that would make me happy. The flow of information rushing through me every day brought me a gift in the form of the excellent OmmWriter program.

What is its difference and charm? All admiration is at the level of sensations. It's like you're sitting and writing, looking out the window. And outside the window there is a snowy field and a foggy horizon. Add to this the meditative music that accompanies your work, the sounds of rain, and the howling of the wind. I never play music when I write. She usually distracts me. In OmmWriter appearance programs and music immerse you in the Flow. Nothing distracts you, but instead envelops you, enveloping your attention.

This program reminds me of Tarkovsky's films. I even watched “Stalker” and “Mirror” the other day. There is some feeling of similarity in moods. I really love Tarkovsky’s episodes when there are no people in the frame. Such scenes immerse the audience in a special state, in which the characters’ dialogues are then perceived differently. The program has the same effect for me. You open it, and in front of you is a snow-covered field and two trees at the very edge. I feel better, the fuss goes away and I start writing.

It’s a pity that the program is currently only available to Mac owners.

This program is really for everyone. And like everything unusual, you either like it or not. But it leaves only a few people indifferent. OmmWriter is currently in beta and therefore . Did you like the program?

I've been using a Mac for a year now and I'm still looking for a text editor that would satisfy me 100%. I've tried a great many of them, I use Pages all the time, but I still don't stop looking. By and large, I would be ready to stay on Pages, especially after the release of i’Life 2009, but I’m not happy with two things: working with .doc through import/export and the lack of normal spell checking. And so, in my searches, I came across an interesting text editor - myTexts, which can hardly claim to be a replacement for Pages, but is nevertheless very worthy of attention.

This application combines a fairly advanced text editor and project management manager. Thus, you can not only write in it, but also collect various information necessary for the book, including images, PDF documents, videos, music and web pages. It is noteworthy that Scrivener allows you not only to open all these files, but to do it in one window with the text of the book, which is convenient for creating descriptions of objects.

Scrivener also has a handy notes board where you can write down your ideas, pin them to specific parts of the book, and add accompanying files to them. In addition, the program has full screen mode, which helps you concentrate on writing text.

Scrivener is distributed for a fee and costs a hefty $39.95, but on the other hand, it is one of the most inexpensive programs of its kind, so if you are a novice author, you might consider purchasing it.

Some text editors are perfectly suited not only for working with plain text, but also for coding (programming). Some of these "notebooks" have become, at a minimum, functional additions to the IDE.

Workspiration participants often mention code editors among other productivity tools. From these recommendations, we have compiled a selection of the best text editors for Mac OS.

Atom - a smart editor for smart coders

Atom is a modern open source text editor, maximally optimized for coding. Available for Linux / Mac OS / Windows platforms, can be used instead of or in conjunction with the IDE.

Each open tab Atom is a standalone web page (using the Chromium engine for rendering). And at the same time, this is a desktop application: it diagnoses code, works with functions and classes, there are standard syntax highlighting and autocompletion, code formatting.

You can add new functions through packages, which are loaded directly through the package manager of the editor. Atom will appeal to those who like to customize their work environment (it’s not for nothing that it’s called “hackable”). Text config files are intended for this. However, the editor works great without configuration, and you can immediately start working with projects.

In addition to customizing functions, configs can also be used to change the interface. All display parameters (fonts, colors) are set via a css/Less file. If you don’t have time to configure manually, it’s easier to choose one of thousands of themes published by other community users.

Sublime Text is a powerful coding editor that has become a classic

Sublime Text- another promising code editor. Initially, many coders and other users were attracted to flexible setup interface and quick change of layouts when coding. You can work in Sublime with multiple tabs and panels, quickly switching between files. There is also a side navigation bar and its own analogue search string on mac os.

The functionality of Sublime Text is excellent. This editor was one of the first to offer extensions to increase functionality. They are installed through a special menu. Sublime Text (and its add-ons) is configured through user configs.

Sublime Text is often used for html/javascript coding or as an IDE editor. If you install add-ons like Emmet, working with HTML code will speed up significantly. You can modify Sublime for almost any programming language, the only question is the existence of the necessary packages.

Productivity in Sublime Text is achieved thanks to many features. Along with the above-mentioned navigation, it is worth mentioning auto-completion, syntax highlighting, and convenient functional search for all files at once.

The cost of a Sublime Text license is $80. The unregistered version works without restrictions, but a reminder window will appear from time to time.

TextMate is a classic code editor for Mac OS X

As TextMate developers note, the editor is able to compensate for the shortcomings of IDE systems. This is a fairly lightweight and scalable editor, unlike many cumbersome IDEs.

Coders use TextMate for speed. Indeed, snippets and macros greatly automate the writing of code. You can install already created ones or write macros for your own tasks.

TextMate is convenient for formatting code, navigation (search and replace with regexp support, working with the clipboard). About fifty syntaxes of programming languages ​​are supported, namely code highlighting and autocompletion. In addition to the above, the editor is convenient when working with projects and work environments.

Compared to relatively young projects (Atom, Brackets), TextMate looks a little old-school, conservative, and, nevertheless, it has many fans among programmers and other supporters of solving problems through a text editor.

Coda is an editor for html coders with convenient publishing and file synchronization

Coda is an editor loved by Mac OS users - especially those who edit html and css. First of all, we are attracted by the live preview function and publishing tools. The edited file can be uploaded via FTP, SFTP, WebDAV to the server. If you configure Coda correctly, synchronization will occur in the background.

In general, Coda contains a standard gentleman's set for coding: this includes syntax highlighting, autocompletion, tabs, columns, and support for extensions - many little things that simplify working with any code and structure it.

However, Coda's focus is editing html markup and css-stylesheets. WebKit is built into the program - accordingly, the user has at his disposal tools such as a web inspector and a debugger.

The product price is $99, which is slightly higher than the cost of any other editor with similar functionality. However, download the trial version of Coda and decide whether it's worth it or not.

Brackets is a free editor with minimal distractions

Brackets are another helper for putting your code in order. Although it is not as functional as Sublime Text, it is more convenient when working with CSS, namely when navigating through code. The editor is designed so that all the necessary tools are at arm's length. Without having to switch between tabs, Brackets focuses on the parts of code you need and offers links to jump to other files.

Similar to Coda, here the emphasis is on Live Preview, which is perhaps the most popular when CSS editing and HTML.

The next point is integration with LESS and SCSS preprocessors, which have long become de facto for layout and coding. Along with this, Brackets supports ECMAScript, so that JavaScript can be edited and debugged without the use of third-party tools.

Despite its youth, the editor has acquired plugins, which are difficult to do without with large amounts of code and high speeds:

• Emmet (accelerated creation of HTML markup using special abbreviations),
• Beautify (improving code readability),
• Git (synchronization with repositories),

and hundreds of others. Even so, Brackets is difficult to make heavy, and it remains one of the most lightweight editors in its category.

Good morning everyone! I'm often asked which text editor is best for laying out WordPress files?

Of course, you can use a standard text editor like Notepad, but there are plenty of other editors that offer features like syntax highlighting, advanced search and replace, FTP integration and much more, which is why I decided to review the 12 best text editors. which are suitable for Mac and Windows users.

1. Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free text editor with open source For Windows users. It is simple and understandable even for beginners, but at the same time functional enough for even the most advanced users. It has syntax highlighting with support for many languages, including PHP, JavaScript, HTML, CSS. The editor has a built-in FTP plugin that allows you to connect to the server and edit files directly without leaving the editor.

1. TextWrangler

TextWrangler is, one might say, a lightweight version of the very popular text editor BBEdit. Given free editor powerful and multifunctional. It's quite intuitive here user interface, so viewing files and working on projects will not be a hassle. TextWrangler is equipped with an advanced search and replace tool, it can directly edit and save files to FTP and SFTP servers. Syntax highlighting for many programming languages ​​is also available here; it fully supports UTF-8 and even allows you to convert the character encoding of text documents.

Coda is perhaps one of the most loved text editors for Mac by web developers. He is famous for his ridiculous beautiful interface and powerful, well-thought-out features. Through Coda you can edit local or deleted files, manage projects, work with several files simultaneously, easily switching between tabs. The editor is equipped with a terminal, a debugger, a set of preview and inspection and many other amazing features.

The cost of one license for Coda is $99, but believe me, it's worth it.

Sublime Text is a cross-platform text editor suitable for Mac, Windows and Linux users. It has all the functions you expect from a powerful editor, and even many other additional and not entirely necessary ones.

Sublime Text has a very nice interface, however, you can customize it to suit your needs and tastes. There are advanced code editor functions that allow you to do autocompletion, autocompletion, calling context menu, multiple selection, split editing and much more.

Three-user and single-user licenses are available for $70. I use it myself and recommend it, it’s very pleasant to work in this code editor. I recommend!

TextMate is something like an operating room Apple systems, but only in the world of text editors. It's simple, multifunctional editor for Mac. It has an ergonomic interface, advanced search and replace functions, autocompletion, collapsible code blocks - and that's just a small part available functions. The editor costs $60, but you can also find a version for free download.

Atom is a professional cross-platform text editor with open source source code. Just like in WordPress, here you can submit packages and themes for software. The editor has a nice interface, which, however, can be changed by setting the desired topic. Equipped with a built-in package manager, smart autocompletion, file browser, multi-window, find and replace function.

BBEdit is a wonderful text and HTML editor for Mac. It has all the necessary features of a powerful editor. Syntax highlighting, Advanced search and replace, autocompletion, quick search, multiple tabs, shared editing windows and much, much more.

The BBEdit editor costs $49.99, but you can download a trial version for free.

UltraEdit is a powerful text and HTML editor suitable for Mac, Windows, and Linux users. Some of the available functions are auto-completion, recording and playback of macros, bookmarks, block selection and text editing, syntax highlighting for the most popular programming languages.

The cost of the editor is $79.5. You can also find free trials.

Vim is one of the most powerful open source text editors; Suitable for Mac, Windows and Linux users. It is an improved and updated version of the Vi editor, has a huge number of functions. It is so powerful and multifunctional that it is rightly compared to an IDE, i.e. with the system software, which is used for software development.

Brackets was developed by Adobe to bring text editors to new level. It is positioned as an advanced text editor that understands web design. The editor opens PSD files, which simplifies and speeds up the coding process. It is a free, open-source, cross-platform editor suitable for Mac, Windows, and Linux users.

1. CoffeeCup HTML Editor

CoffeeCup HTML Editor is easy to use using HTML editor for Windows. It supports PHP, HTML, Markdown, CSS. There are functions such as autocompletion, syntax checking, semantic code and much more. I’ll say right away that this is far from an ideal text editor for many programming languages, but if you want to master and become proficient in working with

PHP, HTML and CSS, then Coffee Cup HTML editor is what you need. Cost $69 with limited free trial version for download.

Espresso is a web developer software that runs on the Mac. It is equipped with a powerful text editor and CSSEdit. It has a very nice interface and many advanced features such as drag and drop, code folding, navigator, live editing and X-ray viewing. Cost $75.

To be honest, this is not a review at all, but a brief description of the problems that I encountered when choosing a text editor for layout under Macos.

Under Windows, for as long as I can remember, I was involved in website layout in Notepad++ and, in general, I didn’t know any grief - I set it to F4 in TotalCommander, went to FTP or locally, edited and saved required file. To be honest, I had suspicions that somehow the work was not going well at all with this: open-edit-save-open..., but I didn’t know any alternatives and didn’t look for them.

After I built Gentoo on my desktop, for the first time I tried to use the same Notepad++ under wine, but something didn’t work out for me and after some searching I discovered the wonderful Quanta Plus editor (strange, what kind of craving do developers have? to these advantages). I must say, the editor literally captivated and spoiled me once and for all. After this, it is absolutely impossible to return to tools like Notepad++. Of course, I probably didn’t have time to study all its features, but I learned some things after the first launches and remained in love with them to this day. What specifically captivated me was working with projects, fine tuning type of indents (the width of the tab can be set not in some conventional units on the screen, but in spaces, which, for example, is important when layout in HAML), built-in work with FTP (that is, there is no such thing as open-opened-save-open... - now just save and you’re done, edit further) and, most importantly, auto-complete (guys... I’ve never seen such an auto-complete again and I don’t think I’ll ever see it again).

And then I switched to Mac.

Inspired by a note on MacRadar, I immediately rushed to install Textmate. I even found some cheat sheet based on hotkeys for him. I decided to try out the editor in battle and immediately broke down... Maybe I didn’t understand something, which is most likely, but I was never able to connect Textmate with FTP. That is, not at all. Using the already familiar Windows scheme, I set Textmate to F4 in Disk Order and when I tried to open the file for editing, I got it in the program’s built-in editor, although local files open just fine this way. I also didn’t find any analogue to the Quanta projects in Textmate... I want to repeat, most likely I didn’t do something right or didn’t understand, because when searching on blogs people complain about another problem - they want to re-encode the edited files into the desired encoding on the fly directly to FTP (another serious minus of TextMate for me is that our Russian folk win and koi encodings are not supported). So, friends, if you have a minute, teach me, stupid, the intricacies of international interaction between Textmate and FTP...

In general, I gave up on Textmate and continued my search. TextWrangler, presented in the same article, was immediately rejected by MacRadar because of the above-mentioned problems with domestic encodings, without which it is still difficult to live (we are forced people, if the company’s servers work with win-1251, then we must too). I was thinking about running Eclipse, Emacs or Aptana, but for now I decided that in my case using an IDE would not be justified. Once I find time to seriously study Rails, then yes, then such machines can be used for layout, but for now I’ve given up on them too.

Whether long or short, I decided to send a private message to Vadim Makeev (a poke at the karma of this worthy husband), who, at one time, was also looking for a good text editor for Makosi. So it was he who recommended a wonderful instrument to me, about which, in fact, I wanted to write this note, but somehow my memories and thoughts spread throughout the tree =].

So, drum roll and Coda is the one and only code editor for me for Mac OS X. Not only is the program functional, it is also incredibly beautiful. It’s rare, you know, that intelligence and beauty are combined... To the point - as promised from the very beginning, briefly =], a list of things I liked and didn’t like.

1. Projects or sessions

Without this, I’ll probably be nowhere. Everything is compact and beautiful, and both the external part of the site panel can be customized (you can, for example, put a photo of your favorite boss so as not to be distracted from work, and then reduce its size so that you don’t get bored) and the internal part (you can immediately specify a bunch of parameters for sites , for example, logins and passwords for SSH, if suddenly the data differs from the FTP account data).
What I didn’t like was that you can’t open files from different projects in the same window. Not very convenient when HTML templates lie on one server, and CSS on another (and this happens).

2. Direct work with files on FTP
Everything is clear here. The option that I loved so much in Quanta.

3. Clips

Pre-prepared text blocks. Well, in my case, these are some comments for CSS files. I haven’t figured out yet whether these Clips can be hung on hotkeys; if it were possible, they wouldn’t be worth it =]

4. Built-in terminal
At first glance, this is a completely unnecessary thing for a text editor, but in practice it turned out to be very useful. Well, for example, while working, I had the urge to transfer a large number of files from one folder to another - no problem, I connect, command and it’s done, here they are my files in the directory tree on the left.

5. Syntax highlighting and autocomplete
If there is nothing special to say about syntax highlighting, then there are some things in the local autocomplete that make life difficult. Although you can live and this is most likely a matter of taste...

I want to end this story with a solemn promise to buy the program if nothing comes of the idea on the side of Quanta Plus under Makos (she doesn’t want to, you know, get ready, since I don’t have a KDE). I’ll invite smart people, we’ll dance with tambourines, and if Quanta rises, I’ll write instructions on ritual dances here. Only you have to buy plastic, they don’t provide any kind of pipe. Okay, we’ll get out of it somehow...