Difference between Intel processors and AMD processors. Which is better - AMD or Intel for gaming? Which processor should you choose? Intel vs AMD processors

Let's figure out what the main differences are between the processors of the world leaders - Intel and AMD.

We will also consider their positive and negative sides.

Major CPU Manufacturers

Everyone understands perfectly well that there are two leading companies in the computing market that are engaged in the development and production of the Central Processing Unit (central processing unit), or, more simply put, processors.

These devices combine millions of transistors and other logic elements, and are electronic devices highest difficulty.

The whole world uses computers, the heart of which is an electronic chip from either Intel or , so it’s no secret that both of these companies are constantly fighting for leadership in this area.

But let's leave these companies alone and move on to the average user, who is faced with a choice dilemma - what is preferable - Intel or AMD?

Whatever you say, there is not and cannot be a definite answer to this question, since both manufacturers have enormous potential, and their CPUs are capable of meeting the current requirements.

When choosing a processor for your device, the user primarily focuses on its performance and cost - relying on these two criteria as the main ones.

The majority of users have long been divided into two opposing camps, becoming ardent supporters of Intel or AMD products.

Let's look at all the weak and strengths devices of these leading companies, so that when choosing a particular one, you can rely not on speculation, but on specific facts and characteristics.

Advantages and disadvantages of Intel processors

So, what are the advantages of Intel processors?

• First of all, this is very high performance and speed in applications and games, which are most optimized for Intel processors.
• Under the control of these processors, the system operates with maximum stability.
• It is worth noting that the second and third level memory of Intel CPUs operates at more high speeds than in similar processors from AMD.
• Multithreading, which is implemented by Intel in CPUs such as , plays a big role in performance when working with optimized applications.

Advantages and disadvantages of AMD processors

• The advantages of AMD processors include, first of all, their affordability in terms of cost, which is perfectly combined with performance.
• A huge advantage is the multi-platform, which allows you to replace one processor model with another without the need to change the motherboard.
• That is, a processor designed for socket AM3 can be installed on socket AM2+ without any negative consequences.
• One cannot fail to note multitasking, which many AMD processors cope well with, simultaneously running three applications.
• In addition, FX series processors have quite good overclocking potential, which is sometimes extremely necessary.

• The disadvantages of AMD CPUs include higher power consumption than Intel, as well as operation at more low speeds memory cache of the second and third levels.
• It should also be noted that most processors belonging to the FX line require additional cooling, which will have to be purchased separately.
• And another disadvantage is that fewer games and applications are adapted and written for the AMD processor than for Intel.

Current connectors from Intel

Today, many leading manufacturers of central processors are equipped with two current sockets. From Intel they are as follows:

• LGA 2011 v3 is a combined connector that is focused on the rapid assembly of high-performance personal computer both for servers and end user. The key feature of such a platform is the presence of a RAM controller that successfully operates in multi-channel mode. Thanks to this important feature, such processors provide unprecedented performance. It must be said that within the framework of such a platform an integrated subsystem is not used. Unlocking the potential of such chips is only possible with the help of discrete graphics. To do this, you should use only the best video cards;
• thanks to LGA, you can easily organize not only high-performance computer system, but also a budget PC. For example, a socket LGA 1151 It is perfect for creating a mid-price computing station, while at the same time it will have a powerful integrated graphics core of the Intel Graphics series and support DDR4 memory.

Current AMD connectors

Today AMD is promoting the following processor sockets:

• The main computing platform for such a developer is considered AM3+. The most productive CPUs are considered to be the FX model range, which includes up to eight computing modules. In addition, such a platform supports integrated graphics subsystem. However, here the graphics core comes into play motherboard, rather than being integrated into semiconductor chips;
• the latest modern AMD processor socket – FM3+. AMD's new CPUs are intended to be used in desktop computers and media centers not only of entry-level, but also of mid-level. Thanks to this, the most modern integrated solution will be available to the average user for a fairly small amount.

Working possibilities

Many people first pay attention to the price of the processor. It is also important for them that he can easily solve the tasks assigned to him.

So, what can both organizations offer on this point? AMD is not known for outstanding achievements.

But this processor represents an excellent price-performance ratio. If you configure it correctly, you can expect stable operation without any complaints.

It is worth noting that AMD managed to implement multitasking. Thanks to such a processor, various applications can be easily launched.

With its help, you can simultaneously install the game and surf the vast expanses of the Internet.

But Intel is known for more modest results in this area, which is confirmed by the comparison of processors.

It would not be superfluous to pay attention to the availability of overclocking, during which the performance of an AMD processor can easily be increased by twenty percent compared to standard settings.

To do this, you just need to use additional software.

Intel beats AMD in almost everything except multitasking. In addition, work with Intel has always been at the highest level.

Energy consumption

Energy consumption is one of the important criteria for laptop owners. This is due to the fact that with low power consumption, the device will work longer without the need to recharge.

In addition, during such operation, a slight generation of heat occurs, which also affects the service life of the main components of the PC.

We should also say something about performance. After AMD acquired ATI, its creators managed to successfully integrate most graphic capabilities processing in the processor cores. Such efforts have paid off successfully.

Those who use an AMD chip for gaming should have no doubt that they are getting good performance, which is much better than the performance of equivalent chips from Intel (this is especially true for those who use a card with ATI graphics).

If it comes to heavy multitasking, then it is better to choose Intel, since it has HyperTreasing technology.

However, this advantage can only be used when software application capable of supporting multitasking, that is, the ability to divide tasks into several small parts.

If the user needs a gaming processor, it is better to combine an AMD processor with.

So, there is a big difference between intel and amd processor sockets. When choosing the right option, consider the differences between them listed in this article. This will make choosing the right option much easier.

Main differences between processors

The difference between Intel and AMD processors lies, first of all, in the sockets - the sockets in which they are installed.

When choosing a motherboard, you must first pay attention to this fact, since it is simply impossible to find a compromise solution.

Sockets for AMD processors

The processor industry is no less dynamic than other areas information technology. Constant improvements to the latest microarchitectures and the release of new ones, although they did not make revolutionary breakthroughs at the beginning of 2016, did give us a wider choice within certain classes of central processors.

Once again we will discuss which processor is better - Intel or AMD, and also compare processors for the system for different tasks. I’ll say right away that the opinion in this article is subjective and can be either supported or refuted by anyone and without consequences. This article will not defend one side or another; everything will be based on the real state of affairs of the global central processor market.

In addition, we will touch a little on the segment of mobile solutions. Specific answers for systems for certain types of tasks will be given in the conclusions, I advise you to hold on and read to the end.

For convenience and quick transition the contents of the article are given:

AMD vs Intel. A short historical introduction

So, let's go. Intel Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices were founded around the same time: in 1968 and 1969, respectively. That is, both companies have vast experience both in the production of processors and in competition with each other. But for some reason, Intel is much more famous among ordinary “users”. And even in some antediluvian technical educational institutions they study in detail the old i8080 processor, which is sore for all technical students. AMD at this time simply released clones of the 8080 in the form of Am9080 processors. And the first successful AMD processor of its own design can be called the Am2900 processor.

Okay, let's not talk about sad old processors with frequency at 3 MHz, made according to technical process 6 microns and equipped with an 8-bit data bus. Better yet, let's slowly move directly to the topic of our discussion, and to modern processors with more joyful characteristics.

Myths about AMD

I would immediately like to dispel the myths about “burning” and “not subject to” overclocking AMD processors. To date, such statements are based on “naked” rumors. About ten years ago there were many precedents for the failure of processors like the Athlon 1400, which simply burned out after the cooler cooling the processor radiator failed. Yes, it was relevant then, but talking about it when it’s 2015 and AMD processors are equipped with excellent thermal protection technology is simply blasphemy.

And the thermal regime depends on various factors, and not just on the processor itself, for example, the efficiency of the processor cooler, as well as the quality applying thermal paste. Regarding overclocking, I won’t say or give much specific models processors, but simply stating the fact that there are processors on sale from the “Black Edition” series, which are oriented towards overclocking by the manufacturer itself. It’s the same with the new FX from AMD, they have not only proven themselves to be suitable for good overclocking, but also boast world records in overclocking.

The negative myths about AMD are over, now we can remember about Intel. There seemed to be no negative myths about Intel. In those days when Athlones were burning, one could only hear flattering reviews about the Pentium. This processor was known and revered by many, and even now when asked: “What kind of computer do you have?” Sometimes you can hear a proud answer -"Pentium".

2016 Comparison of the main processor lines from AMD and Intel

Let me sharply declare that as of 2016, among AMD and Intel we can confidently identify the clear leader in the processor hit parade. And based on this article, you can choose and buy a processor, truly taking into account all your needs. If, in the article which video card is better Since we were unable to identify a large-scale leader, here everything is a little clearer. But this leader will be voiced with rather general notes, since no one has canceled the specifics of the work and budget spheres, but more on that later.

In this subsection of the article we will go through the main lines of processors from two companies and analyze their performance when various types loads, and in the conclusions, as promised, recommendations will be given for choosing a processor for certain tasks. Accordingly, taking into account specific tasks the advantage of certain processors will change significantly.

The description and resolution of the dilemma “which is better: amd or intel” should be approached comprehensively and from different viewing angles, because to the ordinary consumer one thing is necessary, but an avid gamer or overclocker needs something completely different. I’ll say right away that the answer will be dynamic, and I will try to update the article as radically new lines of processors from both companies are born, because this year one is leading, and next year the other.

Let's start a little from afar. When Intel quietly and peacefully continued to produce good and high-quality processors, the AMD Athlon 64 line with a modified K8 microarchitecture was born. It was after the appearance of these processors that many started talking about AMD, and many even moved away from Intel at that time. Several years ago there were more or less equal battles between Phenom K10 processors and the corresponding Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad models from Intel. During these periods, a widespread opinion emerged that AMD processors in the mid-range and budget price range were superior to Intel in terms of price/quality ratio. For AMD, everything seemed to be going very, very well, but then the Nehalem microarchitecture appeared, which dealt a significant blow to AMD and revolutionized the processor market.

Core i3/i5/i7 on Sandy Bridge began to actively sell out, raising Intel higher and higher above AMD. A little later, Intel added heat to the fire by releasing second-generation Sandy Bridge processors. They turned out to be no less successful than their predecessors: many people loved the i5-2400, 2500, i7-2700, and for good reason. Let's not delve into microarchitecture, I’ll just say that Intel developers have thoroughly refined it, adding many different technologies and features.

A little time passed, and Intel announced third generation processors - Ivy Bridge. The intel core i5-3570K, i7-3770K and many others processors did not go unnoticed, although they cannot boast of significant improvements. But given the fact that the prices for Ivy and Sandy Bridge are not separated by an abyss, it would be more reasonable to purchase a slightly polished Ivy Bridge.

What did AMD do at this time? AMD calmly continues to refine the K10 microarchitecture, slowly adding frequencies to the Phenom. Although AMD Phenom II 9xx processors look very good on the processor market, due to their capabilities and price, they are already obsolete and it is quite difficult for them to compete with new products from Intel.

Then the AMD Llano line of hybrid processors is announced, with a focus on integrated graphics directly on the processor chip. The solution is quite interesting, given that Llano graphics show good performance, but in computing tests these hybrid chips show dual-core results Intel Core i3-2100. Some people will like the option of saving on a video card, especially since the savings are significant and Llano processors will be noted by us in the results as an interesting budget option. In addition, a newer line of A-series processors was released - these are Trinity processors, they offer more powerful graphics than Llano, which looks even more delicious for entry-level home systems. Trinity graphics are rightfully considered the best in the world among those integrated on a processor chip.

Things didn't go well in the top segment. Everyone was looking forward to the enchanting launch of the legendary processors based on the Bulldozer architecture. Everyone was expecting a revolution in the processor market, but instead a crude 8-core product was born. In addition, these 8 cores are not entirely complete, since the developers combined every two cores in the Bulldozer microarchitecture into 1 module, which can be compared (conditionally) with one core of Ivy Bridge processors. But I’ll emphasize once again that this comparison is very conditional, since depending on the type of tasks, this very convention can be broken to smithereens both in favor of Intel and AMD.

Then a revision of Bulldozer was announced - Vishera processors with microarchitecture Piledriver – which, according to AMD representatives, gives an increase of around 10-15%, while having a lower TDP and all this is supported by a very tempting price.

Of course, it should be noted that Bulldozer processors and, in particular, their improved version - Vishera– show excellent results under multi-threaded loads, this is clearly visible in the 3d max working tests:

Less is more

FX8350 beats i7-3770K. Approximately the same situation will be observed in all applications that can create 8 high-quality threads, that is, in most graphics packages, as well as in any other types of complex calculations. If we analyze the results, we can see that the gap from the i7-3770K is insignificant, but given the approximate prices of these models - $340 for the i7-3770K and $209 for the FX-8350, I think questions about a more profitable processor specifically for these types of tasks should be removed. Also, the even cheaper FX-8320 will be interesting for these tasks.

But when a single-threaded load falls on the processor, then due to the same unfinished microarchitecture, the bulldozer often loses to opponents from Intel. Those same games typically fail to load more than four cores, which ends up exposing the shortcomings of the Bulldozer cores individually. AMD Vishera processors have corrected the situation a little, but the lag is still noticeable. For clarity, here are some game tests:

Of course, the gaming load falls largely on the video card, but the processor is an equally important link here. Moreover, games that are quite demanding on processor resources often slip through.

The sample of tests presented is too small, but the general trend of testing results on both domestic and foreign sites is exactly this: from the tests it is clearly visible that the i5-3570K confidently outperforms opponents from AMD in the form of the new FX-4300, FX-6300 and FX-8350.

Already in 2015, the Sunnywell company AMD, which had practically no hopes for innovation, announced, of course, the introduction of a new line called Carrizo. The representatives stipulated that the Carizzo is the sixth generation, but it is not clear why the little-known Brazos is not included in the accounting. Well, okay, it’s worth highlighting the following points of this sensational line presented in Germany.

1. Carizzo resides exclusively on one chip, and before that south bridge and the graphics chip were located on two crystals. The functionality of the device is based on 28 nanometers using the Global Foundries process.
2. Four cores have Excavator architecture. The processor frequency was raised only by 1 MHz compared to the previous Steamroller, so the data processing performance per core, alas, increased slightly, but in general everything is not so bad - an increase of about 15%, while generally maintaining the previous principles of data processing .
3. The graphic side has also been updated. In particular, the graphics core received 512 KB of second-level memory. Significant performance improvements are seen when matching tessellation, and very importantly, color reproduction is lossless.

At the same time, Intel did not skimp on the creation and release of a new generation of processors, which were called Broadwell. And it’s worth noting right away that every fan of the Intel team was disappointed. The processor is based on Haswell, made using a 14-nm process technology. The core functionality and microarchitecture did not receive any changes, so the desktop Broadwell turned out to be, to put it mildly, not great.

One of the advantages is a reduction in heat generation. An integrated graphics core Iris Pro 6200 has also been added. These are, perhaps, all the main important additions to the operation of the processor from Intel.

But if we look at it in general, for most games, AMD processors also perform quite well.

In these tests, the main thing for us is not the specific FPS of two games, but the general trend of FX processors lagging behind in games. In the conclusions we will note this fact, which will go to AMD’s liability.

Laptop CPUs

Intel has had enough for a long time reigns in the segment of laptop processors, and reigns very thoroughly. Both budget and top-end laptops feature Core ix processors, which we praised a little higher.

The release of Llano processors did not change the balance of power very much, but it did introduce some variety into the budget laptop segment. But the Trinity processors can be called a truly good attack from AMD. Even more powerful integrated graphics for affordable price, moreover, these processors support Dual Graphics technology. This technology allows the integrated graphics of Trinity processors to work in conjunction with a discrete adapter. As a result, the combination of “integrated Trinty graphics + discrete Radeon HD 7670M” looks very attractive, taking into account the total graphics performance and low cost.

We can safely say that in the budget segment of laptops, the AMD Trinity A4 and A6 series are very interesting for the buyer, as they guarantee more powerful graphics than the integrated graphics in Intel processors.

In the mid-range mobile segment, A10 processors paired with HD 7670 will also delight graphics performance. But already in the fight against certain Core i5s they will have problems on the computing front. With all this middle class laptops remain subject to fierce competition and many will choose the A10 + HD 7670. So in the mid-range and budget segment, determining which processor is best for a laptop is not so easy.

Returning to the same Carrizo from AMD, which was released in 2015, it is worth noting that the system already has an integrated UVD-6 video decoder. Thanks to this decoder, it became possible to watch video in H.264 and H.265 formats. As stated by the Carrizo manufacturers, this is the world's first chip for laptops that can decode H.265.

Intel is also not asleep when it comes to laptop graphics, but it lags significantly behind AMD, as strange as it may sound. Thus, testing was carried out in which Carrizo from AMD and Broadwell from Intel competed, playing 4-K video in HEVC format. The results were stunning: when playing video, a laptop with AMD Carrizo did not load the processor even halfway, while its competitor Inrel was loaded at 80, and sometimes even 100%.

Thus, if back in 2013 Intel was in the lead, then the situation in 2015 has changed somewhat, and now a self-respecting user will prefer a laptop with greater graphics performance running Carrizo processors from AMD.

I would like to note that purchasing a high-performance laptop is a very controversial thing, I advise you to read the article “ laptop or desktop PC”, which will not allow you to stumble on this deceptive front.

Okay, let's not dwell on processors for laptops, but rather move on to the conclusions.

AMD and Intel. Which processors are better? Conclusions

It remains to sum up the battle between AMD and Intel.From what was said above, everything becomes clear, but let’s judge objectively, because everyone has the right to make a mistake, and we will believe that this mistake will be corrected. Let's pay attention to the class of tasks performed by these processors in order to ultimately judge fully.

Processor for a budget system with undemanding tasks

First, let’s answer what is better than amd or intel in the budget segment of the market. Budget systems are quite widespread. These can be both home computers and office systems, where the boss is trying to buy a fleet of machines for the price of the configuration of one normal system.
Here, it seems to me, we should give the advantage to AMD. The same new Trinity, such as the A4-5300 for $50-60, will look great in budget home systems, especially when trying to load the system with graphical tasks such as games. Well, or at worst, you can equip the system with the cheapest Llano, for $40.

For an office fleet of machines, Trinity will also be a good solution, but here they are being squeezed by Pentium G, since in computing tasks they show more high level performance due to the second generation Sandy Bridge architecture and slightly larger volume cache memory.

AMD's 2015 Carrizo will be great solution not only for home use, but can also take pride of place among office machines. But AMD's main goal was to release a completely new processor that would satisfy the functionality needs of laptops.

The Intel company, with Broadwell, which has become the “unloved child,” is largely losing ground to AMD’s competitors. So, in particular, although Broadwell is equipped with a powerful graphics core Iris Pro 6200, the functionality at the level of office calculations leaves much to be desired. Broadwell is not far removed from Sandy Bridge, which really handled computing tasks at the proper level.

So for an office fleet of machines a budget processor would be a good choice Intel Pentium G on Sandy Bridge, released in 2013 or new job Carrizo 2015 from AMD.

Processor for gaming computer

The class of gaming computers is the most comprehensive, because it covers as average? So is the top segment of processors, there is no place for integrated graphics, and systems are usually equipped with high-performance video cards, which do the bulk of the work in games. But a lot also depends on the processor, since no one has canceled the balance in the system.

From the previously analyzed test results, we can confidently say that for the average gaming system Intel required. If you don’t mind overpaying a little, and at the same time you want to get a certain reserve for the next year or two in most games, then the Core i5 on Ivy Bridge in most cases will be the best option than any of the Vishera. In no way do I want to say that Vishera is absolutely unsuitable for games. Due to its price, the same FX-6300 will be a very good option for an inexpensive gaming system, although here it is being squeezed by the Core i3.

But the primacy for gaming loads and a home system like “for all tasks” is still with the Core i5, as the mainstream option can be called the Core i5-3570 or i5-3470 . In particularly extreme gaming scenarios, a Core i7 would be an even more advanced solution, but at this stage of development of the gaming industry and the classic use case, its performance is in most cases excessive.

So for a good gaming system, an Intel core i5 (in some cases i7) is recommended, and for a cheaper gaming system the FX-6300 is a good choice - here you need to look at secondary tasks and, based on them, give preference to one or another option.

Processor for demanding computing work

Video/audio processing and encoding, work in complex graphics applications, as well as any other type of complex computing work or work on entry-level servers - all this can often be divided into many threads.

As we said earlier, multi-threading is the FX-8350's strong point. At its low cost this processor shows the level of the i7-3770K, and sometimes bypasses it in the above types of tasks. Therefore, for workloads, if you don’t want to spend extra money, use only the FX-8350.

Of course, if you have extra funds, you can overpay and get a universal i7-3770K, both for work and for games, which will also be a reasonable option, but still at the well-known price/performance ratio for complex computing tasks FX- The 8350 confidently outperforms its opponents from Intel.

Also, do not forget about the “hard solution” from Intel, in the form of the same Core i7-3970X. This processor best option from desktop: it can do everything better than anyone else, but there’s only one thing it can’t do – be cheap, its cost is about $1000. An impeccable extreme option for those who like to throw money.

The processor options shown here are for different types tasks are very generalized and cannot accurately reflect each individual case, where secondary, but no less important tasks may arise, and the purchasing budget may have a significant impact.

If we talk about the financial side of the issue, then the AMD Carrizo processor is included in the price range from 350 to 750 US dollars, which is determined by the category of application. Accordingly, laptop processors are comparatively more expensive than desktop processors, so again you have to choose according to your accumulated budget. But it’s just worth noting that Carrizo, based on eight graphics and four processor cores, in addition has technology to optimize operation with 15 W power supply. Thanks to this, the new device works 2.4 times faster compared to previous generation Kaveri.

The minimum cost of Intel processors in 2015 is $380, which does not at all correspond to the parameters inherent in Broadwell. In particular, the main role in cost was determined by the graphics core of the latest generation Iris Pro 6200; a slightly improved microarchitecture, which simply improved its Haswell predecessor, as well as a high heat reduction rate. And this, perhaps, is all that Intel can boast about its latest work.

This is how the comparison of processors turned out and the answer to the question: “Which processors are better, Intel or AMD?”

Perhaps there are some controversial points, I will be very glad to see your corrections or additions in the comments, but without a holivar or offensive bias.

Finally, we unanimously wish AMD to pleasantly surprise us with the Streamroller microarchitecture soon, and also try to give a worthy rebuff to Intel, because we don’t need a monopoly and inflated prices.

We wish Intel to reduce prices for its processors and continue to release the same good, powerful and high-quality products.

And I wish you, dear friends, stable operation the “hearts” of your computers, regardless of who and when they were released. All the best!

Which is better - AMD processor or Intel processor? This issue is constantly the subject of heated debate on the Internet. Owners of components of one and another brand argue fiercely with each other, although in fact in most cases they dealt only with their “favorites”. Accordingly, during such a dialogue, it is not possible to establish the truth.

We will approach the comparison as an independent party and compare both solutions according to a number of distinctive parameters

Pricing policy

The first thing most people pay attention to is the price of the processor. After all, not everyone can afford to spend an extra hundred dollars on computer components, and it is not advisable to overpay in all cases.

AMD processors can be safely classified as middle and even economy class. If you are very limited in budget, but your goal is to assemble a current generation system, then you should give preference to this company. For example, a quad-core AMD FX-4350 with a frequency of 4.2 GHz costs about four and a half thousand rubles (as of the beginning of 2014), and the most expensive of the freely available AMD FX X8 9590 models costs just over ten thousand.

Intel, on the other hand, took a different path, significantly increasing the prices of their processors. Therefore, they are unlikely to be an economical solution for the work computer of an accountant or office employee. The cost of mid-level Intel Core i5 and Intel Core i7 models ranges from six to ten thousand rubles (there are cheaper and more expensive configurations, but we won’t take them into account). The top six-core i7 on the s-2011, in general, costs from 32 thousand rubles. The difference with AMD's offerings is clearly not in Intel's favor, but everything falls into place when you look at both processors in action.

Working possibilities

Directly what we buy for powerful processor– his productivity, speed, ability to solve the tasks assigned to him. Let's see what both companies can offer their clients in this regard.

AMD, although not a stellar performer, offers an excellent cost-to-performance ratio. At correct setting everything works stably and does not cause any complaints. Multitasking is perfectly implemented - with an AMD processor you can easily run several applications at the same time: unpack an archive, surf the browser, play music in the player, install a repack of a game, and so on. A similar Intel model will show much more modest results in this regard. It is also worth paying attention to the predisposition to overclocking: the performance of most AMD processors can be increased without problems by 10-20% compared to factory settings using standard software tools.

With the exception of multitasking, Intel is ahead of AMD in everything. Already due to the fact that application and game developers optimize their creations specifically for this brand of processors, Intel’s performance is significantly higher. In addition, the clock speed of the second and third level memory is much faster, and work with RAM is implemented at the highest level. Working with 3D graphics, photo and video editing, and other resource-intensive tasks - for these purposes it is recommended to take Intel solutions (one for now running application actively, there is a significant increase in productivity). For the same reason, Intel is the favorite brand of processors among gamers. computer games, where CPU power plays the second most important role after the power of the video card.

Energy consumption and heat dissipation

A very important criterion not only for those who want to save money, but also for owners, for example, of laptops. The lower the power consumption, the longer the device will last without recharging. With heat generation, everything is clear - overheating leads to interruptions in operation and failure of components.

AMD brand processors consume comparatively more energy than their competitors, which is why you need to be more careful when choosing a motherboard and power supply. Otherwise, critical problems, brakes, and freezes may occur. The same applies to heat dissipation, which is quite high (especially in older models), which is why the standard cooler supplied with the processor cannot cope with cooling under increased load. It is strongly recommended that when buying a CPU from AMD, you also purchase high-quality cooling from Zalman or another well-known company - it will also make much less noise during operation.

Intel. As I said earlier, in most cases they are much more economical and heat up less (average AMD ones are 125 Watts vs 95 Watts Intel ones). However, there were some exceptions here. The older Intel Core i5 and i7 models have already caught up with AMD's flagships and even exceeded their power consumption by 5 Watts with all the ensuing consequences. Now purchasing a high-quality motherboard, power supply and good cooling has become a top priority for everyone who uses a computer on full power. After all, it’s one thing to come to terms with the loss of a cheap budget processor, and another thing to “lose a large sum of money.”

Backward Compatibility

The presence of backward compatibility in the processor allows it to be used with other computer components or software technologies that can already be called outdated.

AMD is focusing on multi-platform. That is, if you have an old motherboard with an AM2 or AM2+ socket, you can easily insert not only processors with the same name, but also AM3 solutions. For example, having a system with a combination of an m2n-mx motherboard and a Phenom X3 8450 processor, it is quite possible to remove the old processor and install a Phenom II X4 955, almost doubling the performance. Thus, AMD becomes an ideal option for lovers of step-by-step upgrades.

Intel processors, on the contrary, cannot be called universal. Each new line is released on a new platform (with the exception of LGA 1155 processors), which leads to the need to also replace the motherboard during the update. In principle, if you think logically, expensive solutions from Intel are bought not just to surf the Internet and watch movies, but for more resource-intensive tasks. That is, you cannot limit yourself to one processor - you also need RAM good, both the video card and the power supply are powerful. Therefore, it cannot be said that Intel’s single-platform nature is such a big drawback.

For several decades now, the debate about which manufacturer's processors are better has not subsided. Now comparing Intel and AMD processors is meaningless, since these companies cannot compete with the Russian MCST :). Elbrus are so good that they simply do not reach ordinary buyers, almost instantly being snapped up by organizations. Ordinary users have to be content with Intel and AMD processors on the “outdated” X86 architecture. Of course, they cannot stand comparison with MCST, but essentially there is nothing else to choose from. Because of this, it won't hurt to figure it out Which is better - AMD or Intel? by comparing them with each other.

Which is better for gaming: Intel or AMD?

Gaming performance has become the main criterion for choosing a processor for ordinary users. Many people generally assemble a computer just for gaming. In principle, we have more people who like to play than people who like to work! =)))

The performance of any more or less modern 8-thread (not cores, but threads!) processor is sufficient even for AAA projects. However, models with less thread should not be discounted - in many cases they cope well with games. Sometimes this is necessary. If gaming performance is limited by the capabilities of the video card (in the vast majority of cases), the requirements for the processor are even lower. The main thing is that it does not give freezes and stutters in games.

And yet, which company’s processors perform better in games? It is very difficult to answer this question unambiguously; ideally, you should always consider and compare specific models. In short, AMD's low- and mid-range processors are better than Intel's. Besides, AMD processors overall much better in terms of price/performance ratio. Intel is the undisputed leader in the highest price segment of desktop processors. The older processors of this company have the highest absolute performance in games.

It's worth noting that gaming performance is not indicative of overall processor performance. So AMD Ryzen show rather modest results in games, significantly behind Intel. In rendering and some other tasks, AMD is better than Intel (if we consider processors of equal cost).

Intel or AMD: which processor to choose for a laptop

Laptops, due to the requirements for high autonomy and low power consumption, receive significantly weakened “stuffing”. Productivity is very important to them central processor and its energy efficiency.

In terms of energy efficiency, the leaders in the laptop market are modern processors AMD. Already now Ryzen has smaller size chip than Intel processors. In 2019, AMD chips will begin to be produced using the 7nm standard. This will further reduce their size, which means increasing energy efficiency. Well, Intel just can’t master the 10nm process technology.

AMD-based laptops also have better price/performance ratio. Built into her mobile processors The graphics are significantly superior to those from Intel. This provides a noticeable advantage, most pronounced in low-end laptops that do not have discrete graphics.

Intel mobile processors boast the highest absolute performance. Built in them GPU quite weak compared to AMD. However, in the case of discrete graphics, this becomes unimportant.

Intel and AMD in 2019: Clash of the Titans

After AMD released its newest generation of processors based on the Zen architecture in 2017, a new round of confrontation between “red” and “blue” began. AMD Ryzen turned out to be such a successful product that Intel had to urgently increase the number of cores. The performance increase in the 8th generation of Intel processors reached 50%, while over the previous 5 years the “blue” giant offered an average of +5% in each new generation.

Increase of cores by 8 generation Intel it seemed a little. In the second half of 2018, it released the 9th generation of its desktop processors, the flagship of which has 8 physical cores and 16 threads. This was a response to the Ryzen 2 and possibly the upcoming Ryzen 3 next year.

Intel uses marketing successfully. So the company gave birth new line processors, . Intel also emphasized at the presentation of its server processors that AMD Epyc does not have hardware support for AVX-512. By the way, there are literally only a few applications that support these instructions.

The confrontation between these titans affects all segments of the processor market. In the server market and in HEDT, both manufacturers offer solutions with a large number cores. For example, AMD's current flagship in the server market, EPYC 7601, has 32 cores and 64 threads. Already in solutions based on the next Zen 2 architecture, AMD will increase the number of physical cores to 64 in server processors. AMD's HEDT flagship, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, has 32 physical cores. At this time, Intel's flagship, the Core i9-7980XE, competing with it, has only 18 cores.

What do you think about this? Which processor manufacturer would you buy and why? Please answer in the comments.

Did you read to the very end?

Was this article helpful?

Not really

What exactly did you not like? Was the article incomplete or false?
Write in comments and we promise to improve!

The processor is responsible for carrying out logical calculations on the computer and directly affects the overall performance of the machine. Today, the pressing questions are which manufacturer is preferred by the majority of users and what is the reason for this, which processor is better: AMD or Intel.

Which processor is better: AMD or Intel

According to statistics, today about 80% of buyers prefer processors from Intel. The main reasons for this are: higher performance, less heating, better optimization for gaming applications. However, AMD with the release of the line Ryzen processors gradually reduces the gap from the competitor. The key advantage of their crystals is their low cost, as well as a more powerful video core integrated into the CPU (its performance is approximately 2–2.5 times higher than that of analogues from Intel).

AMD processors can run on different clock frequency, which allows you to overclock them well

It is also worth noting that AMD processors are primarily used in the assembly of budget computers.

Table: processor characteristics

For connoisseurs of clear graphics best choice will be an Intel Core i5 and i7 processor

It is worth noting that it is planned to release hybrid CPUs from Intel, which will have integrated graphics from AMD.

Video: which processor is better

Let's vote

Thus, by most criteria, processors from Intel are better. But AMD is a strong competitor that prevents Intel from becoming a monopolist in the x86 processor market. It is possible that in the future the trend will change in favor of AMD.